[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))

To: address@hidden
Subject: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 16:33:12 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <200201092039.g09KdqX29781@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
References: <A7002618-0472-11D6-932C-003065F6D8BE@ics.uci.edu><r8ozv8vv.fsf@mak.com><E16OMv0-0001WT-00@imp><3C3C921B.6020804@curl.com><200201092039.g09KdqX29781@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
Sender: address@hidden

Michael Vanier wrote:

> This brings up an interesting point.  How do people on this list feel about
> allowing compiler directives in programming languages?  

Isn't every expression in a program a compiler directive?

Shriram

Follow-Ups:
- RE: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
  - From: "Christopher Barber" <cbarber@curl.com>

References:
- Re: Any and Every... (was Re: Eval)
  - From: "Peter H. Froehlich" <pfroehli@ics.uci.edu>
- Re: Any and Every... (was Re: Eval)
  - From: jmarshall@mak.com
- cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval))
  - From: Zooko <zooko@zooko.com>
- Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval))
  - From: Howard Stearns <stearns@curl.com>
- compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
Next by Date: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval))
Previous by thread: Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
Next by thread: RE: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread