Re: .NET CLR? was no subject

["Peter H. Froehlich" <address@hidden>]

On Thursday, March 7, 2002, at 01:54 , Brent Fulgham wrote:

> Can you say anything to ally our (perhaps unfounded) fears?  I
> know I'd be a lot more interested in using the CLR for projects
> if I felt confident that the work would not end up landing me
> in some kind of patent dispute.

I might be too naive here, but from what I know about .NET there is 
hardly anything that is not covered by prior art, either from the 
TAL people or various other groups that have worked on "wide" 
intermediate representations before (to a certain degree, that even 
includes us at UCI).

Certainly UNCOL is prior art? :-)

Peter
--
Peter H. Froehlich []->[!]<-[] http://nil.ics.uci.edu/~phf/
OpenPGP: D465 CBDD D9D2 0D77 C5AF  353E C86C 2AD9 A6E2 309E