[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: .NET CLR? was no subject
On Thursday, March 7, 2002, at 01:54 , Brent Fulgham wrote:
> Can you say anything to ally our (perhaps unfounded) fears? I
> know I'd be a lot more interested in using the CLR for projects
> if I felt confident that the work would not end up landing me
> in some kind of patent dispute.
I might be too naive here, but from what I know about .NET there is
hardly anything that is not covered by prior art, either from the
TAL people or various other groups that have worked on "wide"
intermediate representations before (to a certain degree, that even
includes us at UCI).
Certainly UNCOL is prior art? :-)
Peter H. Froehlich ->[!]<- http://nil.ics.uci.edu/~phf/
OpenPGP: D465 CBDD D9D2 0D77 C5AF 353E C86C 2AD9 A6E2 309E