[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Macros and anonymous functions

To: Paul Prescod <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Macros and anonymous functions
From: Bruce Lewis <address@hidden>
Date: 29 May 2002 11:44:27 -0400
Cc: address@hidden
In-reply-to: Paul Prescod's message of "Wed, 29 May 2002 08:33:15 -0700"
References: <3CEE94FF.392981A9@prescod.net> <nm9u1os6zws.fsf@cathedral-seven.mit.edu> <3CF4F4BB.23BD79B2@prescod.net>
Sender: address@hidden

Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net> writes:

> Python has anonymous functions.

That's a good thing.  I got the impression you were inclined to remove
them from the language in favor of requiring that all functions be
named.  If you are not so inclined, no argument from me.

-- 
<brlewis@[(if (brl-related? message)    ; Bruce R. Lewis
              "users.sourceforge.net"   ; http://brl.sourceforge.net/
              "alum.mit.edu")]>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Macros and anonymous functions
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>

References:
- Macros and anonymous functions
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Re: Macros and anonymous functions
  - From: Bruce Lewis <brlewis@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: Macros and anonymous functions
  - From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>

Prev by Date: Re: in defense of types
Next by Date: Re: in defense of types
Previous by thread: Re: Macros and anonymous functions
Next by thread: Re: Macros and anonymous functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread