[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Y Store now C++

To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: Y Store now C++
From: Andrae Muys <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 16:09:49 +1000
Cc: Ken Anderson <address@hidden>, Jerry Jackson <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden
In-reply-to: <200303140530.h2E5UBJQ026796@life.ai.mit.edu>
References: <200303140530.h2E5UBJQ026796@life.ai.mit.edu>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3a) Gecko/20021212

DLWeinreb@attbi.com wrote:
> The way to have domain-specific languages be more
> accepted in industry is probably to avoid calling
> them "languages".  Do not say "We are using Fraz
> instead of Java because it is better than Java."
> Build Fraz in Java, or in C++ or whatever, and
> then say that Fraz is a representation, or something
> like that, avoiding the l-word.
> 

"Here at _Frob_Inc_ We don't believe in proprietary languages;  We 
invite you to examine our new 'Turing Complete Configuration Files'"

-- 
Andrae Muys <andrae.muys@braintree.com.au>
Engineer
Braintree Communications

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Y Store now C++
  - From: Matt Curtin <cmcurtin@interhack.net>
- Re: Y Store now C++
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>

References:
- Re: Y Store now C++
  - From: DLWeinreb@attbi.com

Prev by Date: Re: Y Store now C++
Next by Date: Re: Y Store now C++
Previous by thread: Re: Y Store now C++
Next by thread: Re: Y Store now C++
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread