[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aspect Oriented Programming in context of lightweight languages.
Michael Vanier wrote:
> Now that I think of it, I believe the comment referred to metaobject
> protocols. Do any MOP gurus wish to comment about whether a MOP can be
> viewed as a superset of AOP and/or something that AOP can easily be
> implemented in terms of?
I think the latter view is correct. AOP can be regarded as a more
accessible layer on top of a MOP (as in: a set of nice Lisp macros on
top of the CLOS MOP).
Pascal Costanza University of Bonn
mailto:email@example.com Institute of Computer Science III
http://www.pascalcostanza.de Römerstr. 164, D-53117 Bonn (Germany)