[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: what most every language is missing :-)
--- Trevis Rothwell <email@example.com> wrote:
> How about adding a "might-equal" operator? ...
> if (x =? y)
> print ("x might equal y");
> print ("x might not equal y");
> Acording to my studys, the might-eqqul operatir is
> 299834% more
> useful than the standerd ekwal operator.
Well it would certainly make testing easier. I'd like
the operator to have a "possible world" semantics,
schrondinger's-cat =? dead -> true
schrondinger's-cat =? alive -> true
Then I could make a fortune from fortune telling:
client =? healthy-wealthy-and-wise
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!