[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hackers and Painters and Lawyers
Date: Fri, 16 May 2003 14:41:58 -0400
From: "Peter J. Wasilko, Esq." <email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Hackers and Painters and Lawyers
To: Zachery Bir <firstname.lastname@example.org>
X-AntiVirus: checked by Vexira MailArmor (version: 18.104.22.168; VAE: 22.214.171.124;
VDF: 126.96.36.199; host: russian-caravan.cloud9.net)
> Given the spaghetti mess that is the current state of legal code, this
> strikes me as a dubious analogy. Well, perhaps not in your offices :)
> I was IMing with a friend the other day, remarking that it would be
> nice to have more programmers in Congress - perhaps they could
> mercilessly refactor the current U.S. Code.
Hi Zac and All,
We were talking about private contract law drafted by rational parties,
not public legislative processes.
Once you introduce big money politics and lobbyists to the mix all
bets are off.
I am reminded of the attempt in the US Congress a few years ago
to redefine the term "Great Lakes" to include Lake Champlain
(the URL http://levin.senate.gov/floor/032498.htm contains
some relevant remarks from the Congressional record). Part of
me views this as an arrogant attempt to abuse long-standing
traditional usage in the pursuit of funds; another part of me
admires it as an ingenious attempt at refactoring; and yet a third
part views it as the attenmpt of a lazy programmer to fix a bug
while changing as few characters of the code as possible.