[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: another take on hackers and painters
>>: On Tuesday - May 20, 2003, at 08:21 PM
>: Steve Dekorte - May 20, 2003 at 08:31:56PM -0700
>> Without reflection or something to replace it,
>> you can't achieve the same result.
> Sure you can. Just have your "new and improved" compiler retain the
> mate info.
>> For example, take C: no matter how fancy an interpreter you embed in
>> a C program, it's not going to be able to do anything with C structs
>> for which it doesn't have source code or other meta-information.
> Right, but what's to keep us from using our interpreter on the whole
Intellectual Property, past, present and future.
See also my article "Metaprogramming and Free Availability of Sources"
[ François-René ÐVB Rideau | Reflection&Cybernethics | http://fare.tunes.org ]
[ TUNES project for a Free Reflective Computing System | http://tunes.org ]
You can tell whether a man is clever by his answers.
You can tell whether a man is wise by his questions. -- Naguib Mahfouz