[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LFM + LFSP = LFE?
Jakub Travnik <J.Travnik@sh.cvut.cz> writes:
> Does that mean that Common Lisp's separate function namespace model
> would have better maintainability and/or readability in such cases
> over Scheme?
No, but Common Lisp's package system would. If I were daring enough to
tie BRL to one particular Scheme implementation I could use a module
system for shorter names.
However, this particular syntax would still be named brl-when. It's
like the brl syntax, but conditional. There's a regular "when" with an
implicit "begin". "brl-when" has an implicit "brl".
<brlewis@[(if (brl-related? message) ; Bruce R. Lewis
"users.sourceforge.net" ; http://brl.codesimply.net/