[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: CPS in Parrot

To: Matthias Felleisen <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: CPS in Parrot
From: Michael Sperber <address@hidden>
Date: Wed, 06 Aug 2003 21:27:50 +0200
Cc: Michael Vanier <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
In-reply-to: <94674AA2-C836-11D7-ABE1-000A956F2F38@ccs.neu.edu> (MatthiasFelleisen's message of "Wed, 6 Aug 2003 13:51:17 -0400")
References: <94674AA2-C836-11D7-ABE1-000A956F2F38@ccs.neu.edu>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Gnus/5.090019 (Oort Gnus v0.19) XEmacs/21.5 (cassava,berkeley-unix)

>>>>> "Matthias" == Matthias Felleisen <matthias@ccs.neu.edu> writes:

Matthias> It depends on what you mean with "build". It is certainly
Matthias> not true that FunctionalScheme + callcc can express F (my
Matthias> good old friend that produces composable continuations,
Matthias> which eventually made it into Mach 4). I also don't see how
Matthias> FunctionalScheme + callcc can express prompt.

Right.  Filinski's work depends on call/cc + 1 reference.

Matthias> I am also willing to throw in set! and challenge you again
Matthias> to define "build" in a way that excludes at least thing.

Did this sentence get garbled or am I just not understanding it?

-- 
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla

Follow-Ups:
- Re: CPS in Parrot
  - From: Matthias Felleisen <matthias@ccs.neu.edu>

References:
- Re: CPS in Parrot
  - From: Matthias Felleisen <matthias@ccs.neu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: CPS in Parrot (was: A plea for a new old language)
Next by Date: Re: CPS in Parrot
Previous by thread: Re: CPS in Parrot
Next by thread: Re: CPS in Parrot
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread