[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Vectors as functions

To: Michael Vanier <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Vectors as functions
From: Robby Findler <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2003 07:53:49 -0500
Cc: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <200308150440.h7F4eEW32071@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
References: <20030814170153.80D4B6BEDE@laime.cs.uchicago.edu><AA236D25-CEA2-11D7-B 291-0003938EB888@web.de> <16188.3934.267729.188080@cs.brown.edu> <32783.141.154.13.159.1060907724.squirrel@stuff.hrnoc.net> <200308150336.h7F3aErQ208596@pimout5-ext.prodigy.net> <200308150440.h7F4eEW32071@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
Sender: address@hidden

At Thu, 14 Aug 2003 21:40:14 -0700, Michael Vanier wrote:
> 
> Just to clarify, what exactly *are* you advocating?

I wasn't advocating vectors as functions, just explaining what that
meant originally.

Robby

References:
- Re:
  - From: Robby Findler <robby@cs.uchicago.edu>
- Vectors as functions
  - From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <sk@cs.brown.edu>
- Re: Vectors as functions
  - From: mike@newhall.net
- Re: Vectors as functions
  - From: Robby Findler <robby@cs.uchicago.edu>
- Re: Vectors as functions
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>

Prev by Date: RE: bindings and assignments (was: Re: continuations)
Next by Date: Re: Vectors as functions
Previous by thread: Re: Vectors as functions
Next by thread: Re: Vectors as functions
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread