Re: CPS in Parrot

[Michael Vanier <address@hidden>]

> Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 09:07:24 -0400
> From: Matthias Felleisen <matthias@ccs.neu.edu>
> 
> > Landin makes sure to note that an ISWIM
> > program-point definition introduces a
> > "deviant" kind of function, not a plain
> > one.
> >
> 
> Yes, but you need to understand that Landin's program points are even
> more powerful than call/cc-style continuation objects. On top of J you 
> can
> find F, which blows it away. And then there is G, which is the top-most
> control operator.
> 
> -- Matthias, on a nostalgic trip to the past
> 

*drool*

I have one paper on J, and you mentioned F before.  I haven't heard of G.
Is there a paper or papers which describes all of these?  

It's important that we look to the future: the continuation arguments will
peter out eventually, and I'm thinking that maybe J, F, and G could be the
source of future arguments on LL1 ;-)  

Mike