[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?

To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
From: Neelakantan Krishnaswami <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2003 23:38:59 -0500
In-reply-to: <200311010251.hA12pA322694@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
References: <3FA29529.1000602@comcast.net><vt2oevx19u3.fsf@zenia.home><87znfh2lpj.fsf@snark.piermont.com><vt2vfq5yrz2.fsf@zenia.home><31Oct2003.185213.Alan@LCS.MIT.EDU><200311010251.hA12pA322694@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu>
Sender: address@hidden

Michael Vanier writes:
> 
> All-functions-are-factorials-if-you-stare-at-them-long-enough-ly y'rs,

This reminds me of the excellent "Evolution of a Haskell Programmer":

  <http://www.willamette.edu/~fruehr/haskell/evolution.html>

My goal is to reach the state where I consider the second-to-last
version of factorial the natural one. ;)

-- 
Neel Krishnaswami
neelk@cs.cmu.edu

References:
- functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
  - From: Vadim Nasardinov <el-vadimo@comcast.net>
- Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
  - From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
- Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
  - From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
- Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
  - From: Alan Bawden <Alan@lcs.mit.edu>
- Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
Next by Date: Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
Previous by thread: Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
Next by thread: Re: functional languages ill-suited for large programs?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread