[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: dynamic vs. static typing

To: Joe Marshall <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
From: "Peter J. Wasilko" <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:45:15 -0500
Cc: Anton van Straaten <address@hidden>, Steve Dekorte <address@hidden>, Ken Shan <address@hidden>, address@hidden
In-reply-to: <7k1v6rpy.fsf@ccs.neu.edu>
Sender: address@hidden

> Things like the `wedge product' from exterior algebra (thanks
> to Greg Pettyjohn for showing me this) don't require the object types
> to be known.

I'll bite, what is a 'wedge product'?

--- Peter

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dynamic vs. static typing
  - From: Joe Marshall <jrm@ccs.neu.edu>

References:
- Re: dynamic vs. static typing
  - From: Joe Marshall <jrm@ccs.neu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: The Accessibility of Type Theory Research
Next by Date: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Previous by thread: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Next by thread: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread