[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Of Legal Language and CS Notation
> The short answer is yes, lawyers don't really talk that way other than
> to key in on issues. And no, legal language is really more of a
> historical accident.
Are you sure that's what you meant to say? Because I don't believe
that. I have no trouble believing that the actual structure of legal
language is a historical accident, in just the same way that the use
of bars to write type (and logical) judgments is probably a historical
accident, and the use of lambda most definitely is one. And if so, is
all other jargon explicable as a historical accident too?