[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]

To: Steve Dekorte <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]
From: Pascal Costanza <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:54:11 +0100
Cc: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <ED35B324-2013-11D8-99DB-000393ACB27C@dekorte.com>
Organization: University of Bonn
References: <014f01c3b3f2$ad333e20$0a00a8c0@femto.appsolutions.com> <ED35B324-2013-11D8-99DB-000393ACB27C@dekorte.com>
Reply-to: address@hidden
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031007

Steve Dekorte wrote:

> Btw, I'm not entirely against the notion of any form of type checking. I 
> just suspect that the ideal system is highly dynamic and so ST is 
> unlikely to contribute enough to be worth focusing on at this point.

Very well put.


Pascal

-- 
Pascal Costanza               University of Bonn
mailto:costanza@web.de        Institute of Computer Science III
http://www.pascalcostanza.de  Römerstr. 164, D-53117 Bonn (Germany)

References:
- RE: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]
  - From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton@appsolutions.com>
- Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]
  - From: Steve Dekorte <steve@dekorte.com>

Prev by Date: RE: dynamic vs. static typing
Next by Date: Re: dynamic vs. static typing
Previous by thread: Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]
Next by thread: RE: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread