Re: Functional Objects Site

Subject: Re: Functional Objects Site
From: Rob Myers <robm@lostwax.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Nov 1999 09:30:05 -0500 (EST)
Organization: Lost Wax Media Ltd.
References: <comp.lang.dylan.3820B620.3F1E590B@lostwax.com> <comp.lang.dylan.19991104103449.3621.qmail@gorn.americom.com> <ey3yacemp77.fsf@lostwithiel.tfeb.org>
Xref: grapevine.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:11037

Interesting use of the word only. :-)
However, despite any personal allegiences, I must agree that a UN*X port would
make the most sense: a Mac port would be a new processor and a new graphics
layer at least. :-( It might sell more,though... :-)

- Rob.

(I have a Mac so I'm a bit biased here, but at least I have the Gwydion Dylan
Mac port to keep me going. :-) )

Tim Bradshaw wrote:

>  I'd vote for sparc, combined with a Unix/Linux port,
> as that should get any x86 Unixoid system, and Suns, while powerpc
> only gets Macs
>
> (Of course, I have a Sun so I'm a bit biased here).

References:

Re: Functional Objects Site

From: rwk@americom.com

Re: Functional Objects Site

From: Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org>