[Prev][Next][Index][Thread]
Re: HARLEQUIN DYLAN and C FFI
In article <V2iYOGFg4TflhfsQBi5pb6KvCcKy@4ax.com>, Jason Trenouth
<jason@harlequin.co.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:15:01 -0500 (EST), Brian Rogoff <bpr@shell5.ba.best.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I was under the impression that Harlequin Dylan was no more and that
> > the rights were sold to Functional Objects, Inc. Could you expand on your
> > statement a little? The Dylan situation is confusing (as well as tragic
> > :-() and since the FO web site isn't very informative it isn't surprising
> > that people suspect the worst.
>
> What I meant was that Fun-O is now supporting what used to be Harlequin Dylan
> so there's no need to run off. Personally, I still work at Harlequin, but I
> help Fun-O in my spare time.
I think that Scriptics (the company behind Tcl/Tk) has 40 people. If a
language as bad and as blatantly cheesy as Tcl can survive, there is hope
for Dylan.
------------------------------------------------------------------
p h i n e l y @hawaii.edu
Dylan... the high-performance dynamic language
* open-source Unix version: http://www.gwydiondylan.org/
* free Win32 version: http://www.functionalobjects.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Follow-Ups:
References: