[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Simpe Gwydion question




"Bruce Hoult" <bruce@hoult.org> wrote in message
bruce-9A2922.09503916072002@copper.ipg.tsnz.net">news:bruce-9A2922.09503916072002@copper.ipg.tsnz.net...
> In article <457e22d8.0207150346.4b3912cc@posting.google.com>,
>  fn@hungry.com (Faried Nawaz) wrote:
>
> > Lame followup:
> >
> > -- cmucl --
> >   44.7476 seconds of user run time
> > -- dylan --
> >        30.21 real        27.60 user         0.02 sys
> > -- c --
> >        30.20 real        27.59 user         0.03 sys
>
> So Dylan is 60% faster than CMUCL, and within experiemental error of C.
>
> Notes:
>
> - this is a slightly different task than the previous example used
>
> - the Dylan program is running with full safety e.g. bounds checks, type
> checks.  Both the C and Common Lisp programs are unsafe.

This is a great result.  Publish it somewhere.  (Really)