[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[no subject]

Would somebody please elaborate on Dr. Felleisen's suggestion that
'Scheme may have made a mistake' in treating continuations as plain
functions; and, also, what would 'making vectors functions' give us?


> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-ll1-discuss@ai.mit.edu
> [mailto:owner-ll1-discuss@ai.mit.edu] On Behalf Of Matthias Felleisen
> to make it "big" (for some definition of that). Dan is right when he
> says that we
> shouldn't think of them as plain functions and Scheme may have made a 
> mistake
> there. (It would have been better off making vectors functions.) 
> -- Matthias Felleisen