[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: dynamic vs. static typing
Paul F. Dietz wrote:
> > Without early typechecking, the proportion of type errors which
> > manifest during testing and at runtime rises significantly -
> > and often, their nature isn't as clearly identified, so they
> > take longer to track down. Looking at this in terms of what
> > percentage they are of all possible errors is misleading at best.
> But is there any evidence to support the contention that the putative
> savings in debugging time exceeds the extra design and coding cost?
Is there any evidence to support the above implied contention that an
*extra* design and coding cost exists? The costs (in terms of time) with DT
systems may simply be shifted to later in the development cycle.