[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Comments Requested on SML-based "Graphics" Little Language

To: "Brent Fulgham" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Comments Requested on SML-based "Graphics" Little Language
From: Luke Gorrie <address@hidden>
Date: 16 Dec 2003 08:47:10 +0100
Cc: <address@hidden>
In-reply-to: <BE6EE24E3C118B4CAF54769CDA66F36101F1A2F7@ivory.corp.xpsystems.com>
References: <BE6EE24E3C118B4CAF54769CDA66F36101F1A2F7@ivory.corp.xpsystems.com>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50

"Brent Fulgham" <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com> writes:

> Johnny Andersen has been conducting a one-man mission to convince
> graphics programmers to use functional programming in their work. To
> my knowledge, he is the only person currently using SML (or really
> any functional language) in professional graphics development.

I suppose this is a different matter, but the popular Wings3D
modelling program is written in Erlang - http://www.wings3d.com/

Cheers,
Luke

References:
- Comments Requested on SML-based "Graphics" Little Language
  - From: "Brent Fulgham" <brent.fulgham@xpsystems.com>

Prev by Date: Re: mapping data
Next by Date: Re: the forward method [dynamic vs. static typing]
Previous by thread: Comments Requested on SML-based "Graphics" Little Language
Next by thread: RE: Typing and semantics [dynamic vs. static typing]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread