[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?

To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
From: Chris Double <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 09:45:02 -0400
Organization: Xtra
References: <sn5287jlrb.church.of.emacs@localhost.verbum.private> <slrnadji0u.vcm.neelk@h00045a4799d6.ne.client2.attbi.com> <offq87j7co.church.of.emacs@localhost.verbum.private> <bruce-3CF211.16142609052002@copper.ipg.tsnz.net> <it5y87j6nv.church.of.emacs@localhost.verbum.private> <87g010yxi1.fsf@andreas.org> <upu04b0yc.fsf@double.co.nz>
Sender: "Gregory T. Sullivan" <address@hidden>
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.6
Xref: traf.lcs.mit.edu comp.lang.dylan:14166

Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz> writes:

> I agree with the above. I'd add either removing sealing or changing
> the defaults to be open rather than sealed. The number of times I've
> wanted to extend something only to find that sealing has prevented
> me...

I should add that this is because the sorts of things I do in Dylan
don't require much speed. I'm sure if I was doing things that required
much optimisation from the compiler then I'd be a big sealing
advocate.

Chris.
-- 
http://www.double.co.nz/dylan

References:
- are dylan macros Turing-complete?
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
- Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
  - From: neelk@alum.mit.edu (Neelakantan Krishnaswami)
- Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
- Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
  - From: Bruce Hoult <bruce@hoult.org>
- Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
  - From: Colin Walters <walters@debian.org>
- Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
  - From: Chris Double <chris@double.co.nz>

Prev by Date: Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
Next by Date: Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
Previous by thread: Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
Next by thread: Re: are dylan macros Turing-complete?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread