[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LISP in Small Pieces (was Re: So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?)

To: Eric Kidd <address@hidden>, address@hidden
Subject: Re: LISP in Small Pieces (was Re: So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?)
From: Ken Anderson <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 10 Dec 2001 23:47:19 -0500
In-reply-to: <1008041276.2980.13.camel@localhost>
References: <20011210190835.13249.qmail@horse-nettle.ropine.com><5.1.0.14.2.20011210123646.01f7caf0@pop.sidhe.org><20011210190835.13249.qmail@horse-nettle.ropine.com>
Sender: address@hidden

At 10:27 PM 12/10/2001, Eric Kidd wrote:
>Interesting note: The first generation of the Proto->C compiler was
>lightly based on the Scheme->C compiler.  It's a nice, simple
>architecture.

Imagine how great other languages might have been if it started this way.

I describe LiSP as "the pieces are a little bigger an chewier than you'd expect but worth digesting.

References:
- Re: So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?
  - From: "Seth Gordon" <sethg@ropine.com>
- So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?
  - From: Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org>
- LISP in Small Pieces (was Re: So, what the heck is a continuationanyway?)
  - From: Eric Kidd <eric.kidd@pobox.com>

Prev by Date: Re: So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?
Next by Date: Re: So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?
Previous by thread: LISP in Small Pieces (was Re: So, what the heck is a continuationanyway?)
Next by thread: Re: So, what the heck is a continuation anyway?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread