[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: .NET CLR? was no subject

To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: .NET CLR? was no subject
From: Matthias Felleisen <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2002 10:31:05 -0500 (EST)
Cc: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <3C8863B4.3080107@appsolutions.com> (message from Anton vanStraaten on Fri, 08 Mar 2002 02:09:40 -0500)
References: <Your message of "Wed, 06 Mar 2002 00:22:19 EST." <5.0.2.1.2.20020306002049.021bfcb0@zima.bbn.com> <5.0.2.1.2.20020306100245.01e561b0@zima.bbn.com> <013901c1c63d$3a07d0e0$0301000a@arielpartners.com> <3C8863B4.3080107@appsolutions.com>
Reply-to: address@hidden
Sender: address@hidden


Anton, nice description of why you want high-level OSes. You may wish to look at 

 Flatt, Findler, Krishnamurthi, and Felleisen.  

 Programming languages as operating systems 
 (or, revenge of the son of the Lisp machine).  

 In Proc. 1999 International Conference on Functional Programming, 138--146.

I have tried to promote this view, but hey, old LISPers never understand
why you would want to try it again with better languages on stock platforms.

-- Matthias

References:
- [no subject]
  - From: Ken Anderson <kanderson@bbn.com>
- .NET CLR? was no subject
  - From: Ken Anderson <kanderson@bbn.com>
- Re: .NET CLR? was no subject
  - From: "Robert Spector" <spectorhome@rcn.com>
- Re: .NET CLR? was no subject
  - From: Anton van Straaten <anton@appsolutions.com>

Prev by Date: Re: .NET CLR? was no subject
Next by Date: Multiple Languages v. Multiple Paradigms
Previous by thread: Re: .NET CLR? was no subject
Next by thread: RE: .NET CLR? was no subject
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread