[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: in defense of types

To: Pixel <address@hidden>, Michael Vanier <address@hidden>, address@hidden, address@hidden
Subject: Re: in defense of types
From: Matthias Felleisen <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 09:42:30 -0400 (EDT)
In-reply-to: <20020530132630.23A17206F6@sualocin.ccs.neu.edu>
References: <20020529172958.1945.qmail@mail.archub.org><200205292327.g4TNRaL11580@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu><6616qo7s.fsf@kldp.org><200205300555.g4U5t5q13913@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu><lyadqhykdx.fsf@leia.mandrakesoft.com><200205301224.g4UCO9Z4018494@smtp.mandrakesoft.com> <ly1ybtyewg.fsf@leia.mandrakesoft.com> <20020530132630.23A17206F6@sualocin.ccs.neu.edu>
Sender: address@hidden


P.S. If you're curious, you may also look at the home pages 
for these books at my Web page. I tend to have sample pages 
and even chapters on-line :)

References:
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Paul Graham <pg@archub.org>
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Jaeyoun Chung <jay@kldp.org>
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Pixel <pixel@mandrakesoft.com>
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Pixel <pixel@mandrakesoft.com>
- Re: in defense of types
  - From: Matthias Felleisen <matthias@ccs.neu.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: in defense of types
Next by Date: RE: Macros and little languages
Previous by thread: Re: in defense of types
Next by thread: Re: in defense of types
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread