[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: following up on speed

To: Mike Salib <address@hidden>, Daniel Weinreb <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: following up on speed
From: Ken Dickey <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 18:04:31 -0700
Cc: Bruce Lewis <address@hidden>, Ken Anderson <address@hidden>, address@hidden
In-reply-to: <1026799871.8031.285.camel@beg-for-more>
Organization: BitWize Consulting
References: <5.0.2.1.2.20020713200418.00b25da0@zima.bbn.com> <3D339585.4030004@attbi.com> <1026799871.8031.285.camel@beg-for-more>
Sender: address@hidden

On Monday 15 July 2002 11:11 pm, Mike Salib wrote:
>..have people here seen a lot of C/C++ projects play with
> different allocators or tuning strategies? Has anyone seen real use of
> C++'s ability to let your write custom object allocators?

Where I have seen custom C++ allocation is almost exclusively in 
implementation of dynamic languages ([HotSpot] Java, SmallScript) as part of 
a mixed GC strategy.  [Of course, my experience is atypical].

FYI,
-KenD

Follow-Ups:
- Re: following up on speed
  - From: Morgan McGuire <morgan3d@yahoo.com>

References:
- following up on speed
  - From: Ken Anderson <kanderson@bbn.com>
- Re: following up on speed
  - From: Daniel Weinreb <DLWeinreb@attbi.com>
- Re: following up on speed
  - From: Mike Salib <msalib@mit.edu>

Prev by Date: Re: following up on speed
Next by Date: Re: following up on speed
Previous by thread: Re: following up on speed
Next by thread: Re: following up on speed
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread