Re: Aspect Oriented Programming in context of lightweight languages.

[John Clements <address@hidden>]

On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 07:57  AM, Michael Vanier wrote:

>
> Ken,
>
> Thanks for the very interesting history lesson!  Personally, I like the
> idea of having a programmable object model, which is why a MOP appeals 
> to
> me.  I probably will like aspects too, although I suspect that used
> incorrectly it could easily degenerate into spaghetti code.
>
> <half-serious>
> It's too bad language features don't come with security clearance 
> levels,
> so that only programmers with a certain level of expertise could use 
> them.
> </half-serious>


WANTED: certified call/cc operator.  experience a plus.


john "interested parties please submit continuation to..." clements