[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Aspect Oriented Programming in context of lightweight languages.
At 8:55 AM -0500 3/21/03, John Clements wrote:
>On Friday, March 21, 2003, at 07:57 AM, Michael Vanier wrote:
>
>>
>>Ken,
>>
>>Thanks for the very interesting history lesson! Personally, I like the
>>idea of having a programmable object model, which is why a MOP appeals to
>>me. I probably will like aspects too, although I suspect that used
>>incorrectly it could easily degenerate into spaghetti code.
>>
>><half-serious>
>>It's too bad language features don't come with security clearance levels,
>>so that only programmers with a certain level of expertise could use them.
>></half-serious>
>
>
>WANTED: certified call/cc operator. experience a plus.
Heh. Not a bad idea--otherwise you get people like me doing call/cc.
(Which I suppose isn't strictly true, as these days I find call/cc a
bit wussy for my needs, but still...)
--
Dan
--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski even samurai
dan@sidhe.org have teddy bears and even
teddy bears get drunk