[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: another take on hackers and painters
Dan Sugalski <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> At 9:06 AM -0500 5/21/03, Matt Hellige wrote:
>>[Dan Sugalski <email@example.com>]
>>> At 5:00 PM -0400 5/20/03, John Clements wrote:
>>> >Depends what you mean by "a type problem." If I'm adding a number
>>> >and a string, that's definitely a "type problem,"
>>> Is it? What's wrong with 1 + "3" producing 4?
>>Wow... That just makes me cringe... And sets off my "perl proximity"
>>alarm. By the same token, why not have 1 + "3" produce the string "13"?
> It could, sure, but + generally notes addition, and both sides *are*
> numbers, after all.
no, they are not. but both sides can be defined to be valid number
designators, in the eye of the sufficiently perverse beholder.
You have a tendency to feel you are superior to most computers.