Re: s-exprs + prototypes

[Michael Vanier <address@hidden>]

Hmm, I'm just not getting it for some reason.  Can you give an example of
some simple code and its tranlation into trees of (symbol, attached, next)
nodes?

Mike

> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 14:25:27 -0700
> From: Steve Dekorte <steve@dekorte.com>
> 
> On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 02:00 PM, Michael Vanier wrote:
> > What do you mean exactly by (symbol, attached, next)?
> 
> The message name symbol, the attached message object (executed in the 
> context of the return value of this message), and the next message 
> object (executed after the attached message, but in the same context as 
> this message). I think this should be able to handle any tree of 
> messages. It should also cover non-OO languages a well, as OO/non-OO is 
> really just a scoping issue.
> 
> Cheers,
> Steve
> Io, a small language: http://www.iolanguage.com/
>