[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: s-exprs + prototypes
Hmm, I'm just not getting it for some reason. Can you give an example of
some simple code and its tranlation into trees of (symbol, attached, next)
> Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2003 14:25:27 -0700
> From: Steve Dekorte <email@example.com>
> On Saturday, June 21, 2003, at 02:00 PM, Michael Vanier wrote:
> > What do you mean exactly by (symbol, attached, next)?
> The message name symbol, the attached message object (executed in the
> context of the return value of this message), and the next message
> object (executed after the attached message, but in the same context as
> this message). I think this should be able to handle any tree of
> messages. It should also cover non-OO languages a well, as OO/non-OO is
> really just a scoping issue.
> Io, a small language: http://www.iolanguage.com/