[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)

To: Vadim Nasardinov <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
From: Bruce Lewis <address@hidden>
Date: 07 Aug 2003 10:29:51 -0400
Cc: address@hidden
In-reply-to: <3F325E93.6030703@comcast.net>
References: <3B1E4EE5-C811-11D7-94C4-0003939EFE88@knauth.org><3F319E0A.3010608@comcast.net><nm965l936z5.fsf@biohazard-cafe.mit.edu><3F325E93.6030703@comcast.net>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.1

Vadim Nasardinov <el-vadimo@comcast.net> writes:

>  > No continuations to places [2] or [4] are created, because call/cc2
>  > and call/cc4 only get continuations as arguments; they never get
>  > call/cc as an argument.
> 
> How does this reconcile with the actual evaluation results in
> different scheme implementations, as shown below?

I didn't mean that those points in the program were never reached; just
that no continuations were ever saved that would jump to them.

References:
- Re: CPS in Parrot (was: A plea for a new old language)
  - From: Geoffrey Knauth <geoff@knauth.org>
- good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
  - From: Vadim Nasardinov <el-vadimo@comcast.net>
- Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
  - From: Bruce Lewis <brlewis@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
  - From: Vadim Nasardinov <el-vadimo@comcast.net>

Prev by Date: Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
Next by Date: Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
Previous by thread: Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
Next by thread: Re: good pictures vs. good stories (was: Re: CPS in Parrot)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread