[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: A Patent on Continuations?

To: "Trevis Rothwell" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: A Patent on Continuations?
From: "Perry E. Metzger" <address@hidden>
Date: 11 Aug 2003 16:44:30 -0400
Cc: "Bruce Lewis" <address@hidden>, "Peter J. Wasilko, Esq." <address@hidden>, <address@hidden>
In-reply-to: <013301c36043$2c7bebe0$35d7d90c@mchsi.com>
References: <r02000000-1026-402E3318CC3011D78BD6003065B28AFA@[168.100.204.225]><nm98yq0ugem.fsf@department-of-alchemy.mit.edu><013301c36043$2c7bebe0$35d7d90c@mchsi.com>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2


"Trevis Rothwell" <tjr@acm.org> writes:
> Seriously, since they have been used for years and have been
> discussed in numerous publications, how could continuations be
> patented?

You could patent the wheel with the state of current patent
examination.

Perry

References:
- A Patent on Continuations?
  - From: "Peter J. Wasilko, Esq." <futurist@cloud9.net>
- Re: A Patent on Continuations?
  - From: Bruce Lewis <brlewis@alum.mit.edu>
- Re: A Patent on Continuations?
  - From: "Trevis Rothwell" <tjr@acm.org>

Prev by Date: Re: A Patent on Continuations?
Next by Date: Re: A Patent on Continuations?
Previous by thread: Re: A Patent on Continuations?
Next by thread: Re: A Patent on Continuations?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread