Re: bindings and assignments

[Shriram Krishnamurthi <address@hidden>]

Perry E. Metzger wrote:

> Nothing deep -- just something unambiguous and straightforward for the
> beginner.

Michael Sperber's was a remarkably good instance of just such a
definition.  So what didn't you like about it?

(This is a serious question, because I can't see how to improve on it
without going into formal (mathematical) semantics, which is just the
sort of thing that seems to have turned you off!)

Shriram