[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
first class names
On Fri, Aug 15, 2003 at 08:51:01PM -0400, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> At 8:11 PM +0200 8/15/03, Michael Sperber wrote:
> > >>>>> "Michael" == Michael Vanier <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> >Michael> So why not have first-class names?
> >Because it would destroy lexical scoping.
> No it doesn't, it just requires a more interesting version of the
> lexical scope. You get used to it.
> Dan Sugalski
Hum, can someone provide me with a definition of "first-class
names" or give a pointer to such a definition? Google
did let me down on that one.