[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the benefits of immutability

To: "Perry E. Metzger" <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: the benefits of immutability
From: Vadim Nasardinov <address@hidden>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 09:25:09 -0400
Cc: address@hidden
References: <3F40314C.2070702@comcast.net> <8765kvw45l.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <3F40CBA5.2090606@comcast.net> <1061237753.1183.2.camel@belladonna> <87ekziveza.fsf@snark.piermont.com>
Sender: address@hidden
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.0) Gecko/20020607

Perry E. Metzger wrote:
 > His so-called "reason" doesn't explain why StringBuffer is final,
 > too, in any case.

That is correct.  I have not made any comments on why StringBuffer is
final.  What would be the relevance of such a discussion to the issue
at hand?

Follow-Ups:
- Re: the benefits of immutability
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>

References:
- the benefits of immutability
  - From: Vadim Nasardinov <el-vadimo@comcast.net>
- Re: the benefits of immutability
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: the benefits of immutability
  - From: Vadim Nasardinov <el-vadimo@comcast.net>
- Re: the benefits of immutability
  - From: Seth Gordon <sethg@ropine.com>
- Re: the benefits of immutability
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>

Prev by Date: Re: the benefits of immutability
Next by Date: Re: first-class names
Previous by thread: Re: the benefits of immutability
Next by thread: Re: the benefits of immutability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread