[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Java arithmetic overflow (was Re: the benefits of immutability)

To: <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Java arithmetic overflow (was Re: the benefits of immutability)
From: "Kevin Kelleher" <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 08:15:42 -0400 (EDT)
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <3F441844.8010005@newhall.net>
References: <0EBBA7E2-D327-11D7-8C87-003065F305CC@ai.mit.edu> <87r83g44xh.fsf@snark.piermont.com> <200308202220.h7KMKkN23626@orchestra.cs.caltech.edu> <3F441844.8010005@newhall.net>
Reply-to: address@hidden
Sender: address@hidden


There is a paper called "How Java's Floating-Point Hurts Everyone
Everywhere" at http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/

The paper is a bit disorganized, but the point is clear.

-- 
Kevin Kelleher <kkell@znet.com>

References:
- Re: the benefits of immutability
  - From: "James Y. Knight" <jknight@ai.mit.edu>
- Java arithmetic overflow (was Re: the benefits of immutability)
  - From: "Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com>
- Re: Java arithmetic overflow (was Re: the benefits of immutability)
  - From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
- Re: Java arithmetic overflow (was Re: the benefits of immutability)
  - From: Mike Newhall <mike@newhall.net>

Prev by Date: Re: CPS in Parrot
Next by Date: Re: Java GOOD -- Fire BAD
Previous by thread: Re: Java arithmetic overflow (was Re: the benefits of immutability)
Next by thread: Re: the benefits of immutability
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread