Re: Vectors as functions

[Dan Sugalski <address@hidden>]

At 4:04 PM +0200 8/16/03, Michael Sperber wrote:
>  >>>>> "Dan" == Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org> writes:
>
>Dan> No it doesn't, it just requires a more interesting version of the
>Dan> lexical scope. You get used to it.
>
>Not for any definition of lexical scope I can think of.  See my other
>message on the subject.

I have, and I have to deal with this very issue. You can mix 
first-class names and lexical scoping without any trouble.
-- 
                                         Dan

--------------------------------------"it's like this"-------------------
Dan Sugalski                          even samurai
dan@sidhe.org                         have teddy bears and even
                                       teddy bears get drunk