[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Java
>>>>> "DW" == Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com> writes:
DW> Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 09:35:59 -0600
DW> From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
DW> I have exactly as much control over Perl and Python as I
DW> want. If I am willing to put in the time and effort I can
DW> maintain PPython and PPerl variants.
DW> You can create your own language if you want to, but that
DW> doesn't mean you have power to control Perl and Python.
Isn't this getting a bit far afield for lightweight languages? I
don't see how Paul's purported control over Python or his lack of
control over Java affect whether a language is suitable for
lightweight tasks.
DW> I "glob" so rarely that I didn't even know what the word "glob"
DW> meant until you mentioned it and I had to go look it up.
Indeed, I know what glob is. I help develop a language that has glob
support. Yet I can't recall writing a program that used glob.
DW> Most technologists want languages driven by
DW> technology. That's what Java had in the early days but has
DW> since lost.
DW> Yeah, making products for technologists, and being "driven by
DW> technology", in the sense you mean, is definitely what we did at
DW> Symbolics. May it rest in peace.
Has anyone ever made a successful business of selling a language?
Jeremy
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Java
- From: "S. Alexander Jacobson" <alex@shop.com>
- Re: Java
- From: Tony Kimball <alk@pobox.com>
- Re: Java
- From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>
- References:
- Re: Java
- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Re: Java
- From: Dan Weinreb <dlw@exceloncorp.com>