[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)

To: address@hidden
Subject: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
From: Tony Kimball <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2001 01:32:33 -0600
Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden
References: <000901c188e9$7708afa0$0100a8c0@femto><000001c188f4$901aae70$8e01a8c0@smallscript.com>
Reply-to: address@hidden
Sender: address@hidden

:     add 2 3
:     2 add 3
:     3 add 2
:     2 3 add
: 
: are all sensibly parsable constructs as a human being. 

In English imperative sentences, the verb comes first.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
  - From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton@appsolutions.com>
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transitionto s-expr)
  - From: Avi Bryant <avi@beta4.com>
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
  - From: "David Simmons" <David.Simmons@smallscript.net>
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
  - From: "David Simmons" <David.Simmons@smallscript.net>

References:
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
  - From: "Anton van Straaten" <anton@appsolutions.com>
- RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
  - From: "David Simmons" <David.Simmons@smallscript.net>

Prev by Date: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
Next by Date: RE: expressions vs. statements
Previous by thread: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
Next by thread: RE: Functional Paradigm popularity and Maths (Was: XML as a transition to s-expr)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread