[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))

To: address@hidden
Subject: Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
From: Shriram Krishnamurthi <address@hidden>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 11:15:33 -0500 (EST)
In-reply-to: <200201101607.LAA28712@labean.East.Sun.COM>
References: <200201101607.LAA28712@labean.East.Sun.COM>
Sender: address@hidden

Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs wrote:

> Let me suggest (with a sly grin) that the distinction between
> language construct and compiler directive is exactly as crisp
> as the distinction between language and library.

That's slick.  Very slick.  It lets me declare victory and go home --
and lets my respondents do the same!

Shriram, victorious and @home

References:
- Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
  - From: Guy Steele - Sun Microsystems Labs <gls@labean.East.Sun.COM>

Prev by Date: RE: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
Next by Date: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval))
Previous by thread: Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
Next by thread: Re: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread