[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: compiler directives; (was: Re: cheerful static typing (was: Any and Every... (was: Eval)))
> Michael Vanier wrote:
> >>> This brings up an interesting point. How do people on this list
> >>> feel about allowing compiler directives in programming languages?
> Shriram Krishnamurthi asked:
> >> Isn't every expression in a program a compiler directive?
> "Christopher Barber" <email@example.com> writes:
> > No. The term "compiler directive" refers to meta instructions to
> > the compiler that may affect how it works in some way, but aren't
> > officially part of the program (although a directive might be
> > required for a program to compile, link or run properly). Typical
> > examples are directives that enable or disable compilation errors or
> > warnings, affect how code is generated, and so on. Some languages
> > allow compiler directives to be specified in the code. Others force
> > you to specify directives in the development environment, for
> > example as command line flags.
> I have to support Shriram here. I fail to see the distinction.
If there is no distinction, then the term "compiler directive" is not useful
and the whole discussion is moot.