http://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/SimRoof/PerfectLambertian | |
SimRoof: Lambertian Perfromance Limits |
A flat Lambertian emitter radiates uniformly over the whole hemisphere.
Note: In a scatter-plot two points at identical locations look no different from one point at that location. In order to reduce this effect, SimRoof dithers Typical Meteorological Year (TMY3) data values by up to half their resolution (as measured when the TMY3 file is read).
The top left plot shows the maximum diurnal radiative cooling at ambient temperature versus the simultaneous solar irradiance in Guam. Notice that the solar range is ten times the radiative cooling range. A perfect CoolRoof would reflect all solar radiation while having a thermal-infrared emissivity of one. It would have the hourly cooling distribution shown in the top right plot.
Available Cooling vs Solar Irradiance | Perfect CoolRoof |
---|---|
Solar Irradiance | Totally Absorbing Roof |
The bottom left plot shows the hourly distribution of solar irradiance impinging on a horizontal roof. The bottom right plot shows the net heating of a perfectly absorbing and emissive roof.
Next we examine the first, tenth, median, ninetieth and ninety-ninth percentiles of available cooling versus solar radiance and time:
Available Cooling vs Solar Irradiance | Perfect CoolRoof |
---|---|
The "Perfect CoolRoof" graph shows that:
For a perfect CoolRoof in Guam, the radiative cooling available varies little with time-of-day. We can plot availability versus ambient temperature:
Available Cooling vs Temperature | Histogram of Ambient Temperature |
---|---|
This histogram shows that performance below 23°C is unimportant because there are few such hours.
The limit cases discussed above are for the 912120TY TMY3 (Guam). The links below are to pages with scatter-plots, for each tropical or southwestern US desert TMY3 in Class I or II, of hourly net-infrared-radiative-transfer (NIRT) versus time of day and diurnal (daytime) NIRT versus dry-bulb-temperature. They are in order of increasing distance from the equator.
Some of the NIRT-vs-DBT plots show vertical banding. Most of the TMY3 datasets seem to include temperature measurements with different precisions. A precision of 1° Fahrenheit is common, so the temperature values are dithered by 5/9°C.
The tropical locations have wide variation in the amount of Lambertian radiative-cooling possible. At 99% availability, Lanai, Hawaii has less than 7 W/m2, while Mercedita, Puerto Rico has 20 W/m2. At 90% availability, Hilo International Airport, Hawaii has 11 W/m2 of cooling, while several sites have 40 W/m2.
I am a guest and not a member of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.
My actions and comments do not reflect in any way on MIT. | ||
SimRoof | ||
agj @ alum.mit.edu | Go Figure! |