heat radiating upward from roof http://people.csail.mit.edu/jaffer/SimRoof/PerfectLambertian

SimRoof: Lambertian Perfromance Limits


Limit Cases

A flat Lambertian emitter radiates uniformly over the whole hemisphere.

Note: In a scatter-plot two points at identical locations look no different from one point at that location. In order to reduce this effect, SimRoof dithers Typical Meteorological Year (TMY3) data values by up to half their resolution (as measured when the TMY3 file is read).

The top left plot shows the maximum diurnal radiative cooling at ambient temperature versus the simultaneous solar irradiance in Guam. Notice that the solar range is ten times the radiative cooling range. A perfect CoolRoof would reflect all solar radiation while having a thermal-infrared emissivity of one. It would have the hourly cooling distribution shown in the top right plot.

Available Cooling vs Solar IrradiancePerfect CoolRoof
Plot of Net Infrared Radiative Transfer versus Solar Radiative Gain over typical meteorological year; hr>6 hr<18 Plot of Net Infrared Radiative Transfer versus time-of-day over typical meteorological year
Solar IrradianceTotally Absorbing Roof
Plot of Solar Radiative Gain versus time-of-day over typical meteorological year Plot of Net Radiative Transfer versus Time over typical meteorological year

The bottom left plot shows the hourly distribution of solar irradiance impinging on a horizontal roof. The bottom right plot shows the net heating of a perfectly absorbing and emissive roof.

Next we examine the first, tenth, median, ninetieth and ninety-ninth percentiles of available cooling versus solar radiance and time:

Available Cooling vs Solar IrradiancePerfect CoolRoof
Plot of Net Infrared Radiative Transfer availabilities versus Solar Radiative Gain over typical meteorological year; hr>6 hr<=18 Plot of Net Infrared Radiative Transfer availabilities versus Time over typical meteorological year

The "Perfect CoolRoof" graph shows that:

For a perfect CoolRoof in Guam, the radiative cooling available varies little with time-of-day. We can plot availability versus ambient temperature:

Available Cooling vs TemperatureHistogram of Ambient Temperature
Plot of Net Infrared Radiative Transfer availabilities versus Dry Bulb Temperature over typical meteorological year Histogram of Dry Bulb Temperature over typical meteorological year

This histogram shows that performance below 23°C is unimportant because there are few such hours.

Perfect Lambertian at Other Sites

The limit cases discussed above are for the 912120TY TMY3 (Guam). The links below are to pages with scatter-plots, for each tropical or southwestern US desert TMY3 in Class I or II, of hourly net-infrared-radiative-transfer (NIRT) versus time of day and diurnal (daytime) NIRT versus dry-bulb-temperature. They are in order of increasing distance from the equator.

Some of the NIRT-vs-DBT plots show vertical banding. Most of the TMY3 datasets seem to include temperature measurements with different precisions. A precision of 1° Fahrenheit is common, so the temperature values are dithered by 5/9°C.

Analysis

The tropical locations have wide variation in the amount of Lambertian radiative-cooling possible. At 99% availability, Lanai, Hawaii has less than 7 W/m2, while Mercedita, Puerto Rico has 20 W/m2. At 90% availability, Hilo International Airport, Hawaii has 11 W/m2 of cooling, while several sites have 40 W/m2.


Copyright © 2010 Aubrey Jaffer

I am a guest and not a member of the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory.  My actions and comments do not reflect in any way on MIT.
SimRoof
agj @ alum.mit.edu
Go Figure!