[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Have you always dreamed of become a high payed consultant?
James J. Gavan wrote:
>
> Robert Graham wrote:
>
>
>>Tim Scrivens wrote:
>>
>>>"Robert Graham" <rgraham2@nycap.rr.com> wrote in message
>>>3DE15AC5.3040602@nycap.rr.com">news:3DE15AC5.3040602@nycap.rr.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>Alistair Maclean wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>In article <3ddf96d3_6@Usenet.com>, Peter E. C. Dashwood <dashwood@nospa
>>>>>m.enternet.co.nz> writes
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Hmmm... waiting to get "payed" with "baited" breath...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Pete.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Email left unread due to misspelling of "sometmes".
>>>>>
>>>>>ps English is mutating/evolving and expanding not declining.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>And U.S. English is evolving the fastest. We are more than
>>>>happy to take words from anyone's language and make it our
>>>>own. We're economical as well. Look at all the U's we've
>>>>dropped, like in "color" as opposed to "colour", etc.
>>>>
>>>>We've even had movements to change to a phonetic form of
>>>>spelling - "kat" for "cat". Think of what that would do to
>>>>your spell checkers! If you look at old writing from 200
>>>>years ago, great people had very bad spelling. Sometimes in
>>>>the same document they would spell a word several different
>>>>ways.
>>>
>>>
>>>We do that now, and never even notice.
>>>
>>>OK and Okay, for example.
>>>
>>>And from memory, there are 4 acceptable spellings for "panatella", depending
>>>on which dictionary you use.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>And some dictionaries even think "irregardless" is
>>acceptable. If you can't have fun with the language you'll
>>end up like the French, with a language police preventing
>>the usage of any formerly French words that have been
>>"Americanized". I wonder how they have a rendez-vous now,
>>since we use it all the time in the U.S.
>>Can they even use "R.S.V.P." any more???
>
>
> You are dead wrong about "irregardless"; it's in the same category as "I 'aven't
> got none" a sort of double negative, beyond regard and regard-less. In sheer
> despair at the abuse of the mother tongue in N. America, I believe I'm correct in
> saying that the venerable Oxford Dictionary introduced 'irregardless' as, sigh,
> being acceptable. Did that about the same time they agreed it was OK for the
> Chairman of the Board to sing "Nooh York ! Nooh York !".
>
> PS: Netscape spellchecker, (using either the US or English versions), queried
> 'irregardless' but offered no alternatives <G>
>
> Jimmy, Calgary AB
>
Why look for an alternative when irregardless is in a class
all its own. By the way, Frank Sinatra was from New Jersey,
which is not really a part of New York, even if the NY radio
stations refer to NJ as New York's western suburbs.