[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
On Nov 17, 2003, at 17:45, Dan Sugalski wrote:
> What I find most effective (modulo heckling from the LL audience here)
> is
> "Larry and Bjarne were both language design pros, and look what they
> ended
> up with. And you think you can do better?"
I have yet to meet a passionate lover of C++, but I have met many
passionate defenders of Perl, especially among the 20-somethings
inheriting the world. I've seen good developers quit when management
hinted they might have to use something other than Perl. I'm guessing
the cool factor comes from the explosive power of context in Perl,
which, oddly, reminds me of the nuclear-powered syntax of APL.
Geoffrey
--
Geoffrey S. Knauth | http://knauth.org/gsk
- References:
- Re: dual-language systems increase modularity
- Re: dual-language systems increase modularity
- From: Michael Vanier <mvanier@cs.caltech.edu>
- Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Mike Newhall <mike@newhall.net>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Mike Newhall <mike@newhall.net>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Miles Egan <miles@caddr.com>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Jim Blandy <jimb@redhat.com>
- Re: Rather, DSSLs increase modularity, productivity
- From: Dan Sugalski <dan@sidhe.org>